Learn How This Case Affects Your Rights and Get Answers to Your Questions About the Case
MCS BIPA Settlement
Saroya Roberson, et al. v. Maestro Consulting Services, LLC, et al.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Case No.: 3:20-cv-895
Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel
If you were a non-union employee at one or more of the Illinois Symphony Facilities listed below and at the time used a finger or hand scan timekeeping device, then you might be eligible for a pro rata cash payment.
The included Illinois Symphony Facilities (as per the Settlement Agreement) are:
- Maestro Consulting Services LLC
- Symphony Sycamore LLC
- Symphony Beverly, LLC
- Symphony Bronzeville Park, LLC
- Symphony of Evanston Healthcare, LLC
- Symphony Park South, LLC
- Symphony South Shore, LLC
- Symcare Healthcare, LLC
- Symphony HMG LLC
- Symcare HMG LLC
- Symphony Crestwood LLC
- Symphony Deerbrook LLC
- Renaissance at Hillside, Inc.
- Claridge Imperial Ltd.
- Symphony Maple Ridge LLC
- Symphony Dialysis LLC
- Symphony Aspen Ridge, LLC
- Renaissance at 87th Street, Inc.
- Aria Post Acute Care Center, LLC
- Renaissance at Midway, Inc.
- Renaissance at South Shore, Inc.
- Renaissance at Halsted, LLC
- Chevy Chase Corp.
- Jackson Corp.
- Claremont Extended Healthcare, LLC
- Claridge Ivy, Ltd.
- Concerto Dialysis LLC
- Church Street Station Nursing and Living Center, LLC
- California Gardens Corp.
- Symphony of California Gardens LLC
- Monroe Corp.
- Symphony McKinley LLC
- Symphony Oswego LLC
- Symphony Lincoln Park LLC
- Symphony Midway LLC
- Symphony Jackson Square LLC
- Symphony Hanover Park LLC
- Symphony Buffalo Grove LLC
- Symphony Northwoods LLC
- Symphony Maple Crest LLC
- Symphony Countryside LLC
The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq., prohibits private companies from collecting, capturing, obtaining, storing, transferring, and/or using the biometric identifiers and/or information of another individual for any purpose without first providing such individual with certain written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The Litigation alleges that Defendants violated BIPA by requiring certain current and/or former non-union employees to submit their biometric identifiers and/or biometric information without first providing the requisite disclosures or obtaining the requisite consents. For their part, Defendants deny each and every allegation of wrongdoing, liability, and damages that were or could have been asserted in the litigation and that the claims in the litigation would be appropriate for class treatment if the Litigation were to proceed through trial.